Comments on: F-Secure Calls on ICANN To Introduce .SAFE http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html Keeping domainers up-to-date Wed, 08 Feb 2012 05:44:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Calvert http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html/comment-page-1#comment-440777 Calvert Mon, 26 Sep 2011 00:30:33 +0000 http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html#comment-440777 Hello there, pleased i came across your website. It helped me to understand this issue a little improved. Hello there, pleased i came across your website. It helped me to understand this issue a little improved.

]]> By: Christopher Ambler http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html/comment-page-1#comment-3005 Christopher Ambler Wed, 11 Apr 2007 18:57:21 +0000 http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html#comment-3005 A very similar proposal for .MAIL was made in the 2003/2004 sTLD round. The proposal (which I helped write) would have applied a layer of authentication to electronic mail. While this would not have prevented spam and phishing, it would have provided a secure channel to know that email sent in this manner was specifically *not* spam or phishing messages. This was an actual TLD application in the same round as .TEL, .ASIA and .CAT - ICANN turned the proposal down. A very similar proposal for .MAIL was made in the 2003/2004 sTLD round. The proposal (which I helped write) would have applied a layer of authentication to electronic mail. While this would not have prevented spam and phishing, it would have provided a secure channel to know that email sent in this manner was specifically *not* spam or phishing messages.

This was an actual TLD application in the same round as .TEL, .ASIA and .CAT – ICANN turned the proposal down.

]]> By: Daniel http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html/comment-page-1#comment-2952 Daniel Wed, 11 Apr 2007 01:49:51 +0000 http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html#comment-2952 TLD Against phishing? i do not belive they will make the TLD's becouse of the reason of phising, i am a server admin and each day there are all kinds of scammers trying to do something else, the only way to fight scammers is not by softwares or scripts, or oparators, it is by creating culture, job places and good education, the right combination is massive google earth tracer with the right offices to control the internet crimes, that of course,require funds. TLD Against phishing? i do not belive they will make the TLD's becouse of the reason of phising, i am a server admin and each day there are all kinds of scammers trying to do something else, the only way to fight scammers is not by softwares or scripts, or oparators, it is by creating culture, job places and good education, the right combination is massive google earth tracer with the right offices to control the internet crimes, that of course,require funds.

]]> By: Licantropo http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html/comment-page-1#comment-2943 Licantropo Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:44:39 +0000 http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html#comment-2943 Well, you need do some really effective for not too much sense of security. Maybe ... 50,000 USD Yearly and need to be purchased by two years at least ? The ral problem is the fragmentation... no body use aero museum travel or jobs, or if is the case, are around the .000000001 % of the whole internet. Well, you need do some really effective for not too much sense of security.

Maybe … 50,000 USD Yearly and need to be purchased by two years at least ?

The ral problem is the fragmentation… no body use aero museum travel or jobs, or if is the case, are around the .000000001 % of the whole internet.

]]> By: Matt http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html/comment-page-1#comment-2932 Matt Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:03:33 +0000 http://www.dailydomainer.com/2007138-f-secure-calls-on-icann-to-introduce-safe.html#comment-2932 I'm torn between saying it's an excellent idea and saying the opposition has a point. A TLD of this sort would give users a base of some sort to ensure they are working on safe grounds, and i cannot see much scope for misuse if it is thoroughly regulated. I'm for it personally. I'm torn between saying it's an excellent idea and saying the opposition has a point. A TLD of this sort would give users a base of some sort to ensure they are working on safe grounds, and i cannot see much scope for misuse if it is thoroughly regulated.

I'm for it personally.

]]>